ADMIN QUESTION OF THE WEEK 1
www.VUE DES ISLES.com - CHANNEL ISLANDS :: Channel Islands Forum :: Guernsey Forum :: States & Public Services :: Points of view :: Admin question of the week
Page 1 of 1•
ADMIN QUESTION OF THE WEEK 1
Is tourism worth saving and if so what would the Candidates do to save it?
Last edited by GD on Mon 07 Apr 2008, 8:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
......THE BOSS......
"Always be yourself because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind"
"Always be yourself because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind"
Re: ADMIN QUESTION OF THE WEEK 1
No takers yet so I'll have go !
Yes, I believe tourism is definitely worth saving. It has a number of benefits,
a) It brings money into the island which we sorely need.
b)It provides a number of jobs with corresponding ETI and SI contributions.
c)It helps towards airport and harbour running costs and in theory helps to hold down travel costs to and from the Island (although one does wonder!)
d) It is an alterrnative economy to finance.
e)I believe it probably contributes quite well to the finances of museums etc which are probably not used so much by locals, it helps to keep these facilities open.
It faces three major problems, cost of getting here, decreasing bed numbers and lack of investment. The tourist board of yesteryear, in their infinite wisdom, sought to get rid of the low budget tourist, this had a knock on effect in numbers travelling and ergo travel costs and saw the closure of most Guest Houses and low budget hotels.
What can we do ? Keep up pressure on carriers to offer a good, frequent service at a reasonable price. I don't think open skies policy would work. We do not have the bed capacity to tempt other "low budget" airlines, if they did operate seasonally it would be a case of cherry picking and regular operators would suffer as would the service.
I'm not sure what tourism's budget it these days, maybe some of it could be redirected into offering development subsidies. I am guessing that with Zero-10 this may already be offering some incentive to plough back profits rather than distribute them.
Perhaps more leniency could be given on housing licences for management if none available locally.
The above are all off the top of the head ideas, to have a proper look at it would need access to all the figures and obviously input from the tourist industry.
Cheers,
Paul D
Yes, I believe tourism is definitely worth saving. It has a number of benefits,
a) It brings money into the island which we sorely need.
b)It provides a number of jobs with corresponding ETI and SI contributions.
c)It helps towards airport and harbour running costs and in theory helps to hold down travel costs to and from the Island (although one does wonder!)
d) It is an alterrnative economy to finance.
e)I believe it probably contributes quite well to the finances of museums etc which are probably not used so much by locals, it helps to keep these facilities open.
It faces three major problems, cost of getting here, decreasing bed numbers and lack of investment. The tourist board of yesteryear, in their infinite wisdom, sought to get rid of the low budget tourist, this had a knock on effect in numbers travelling and ergo travel costs and saw the closure of most Guest Houses and low budget hotels.
What can we do ? Keep up pressure on carriers to offer a good, frequent service at a reasonable price. I don't think open skies policy would work. We do not have the bed capacity to tempt other "low budget" airlines, if they did operate seasonally it would be a case of cherry picking and regular operators would suffer as would the service.
I'm not sure what tourism's budget it these days, maybe some of it could be redirected into offering development subsidies. I am guessing that with Zero-10 this may already be offering some incentive to plough back profits rather than distribute them.
Perhaps more leniency could be given on housing licences for management if none available locally.
The above are all off the top of the head ideas, to have a proper look at it would need access to all the figures and obviously input from the tourist industry.
Cheers,
Paul D
Paul Domaille- 2

-

Number of posts: 13
Location: St Pierre du Bois, Guernsey
Registration date: 2008-03-27
ADMIN QUESTION OF THE WEEK
YES. FIX THE RUNWAY!
kuttelwascher- Politician

-

Number of posts: 8
Location: St. Peter Port
Registration date: 2008-03-28
Re: ADMIN QUESTION OF THE WEEK 1
cheaper flights,cheaper sea travel.try and encourage the bucket and spade brigade back.guernsey tried to go up market with hotel accommodation and got rid of lots of the little guest houses. mind you everything that tourists thought were cheaper here no longer are.of course with a lot of the uk chains charging vat plus there is no advantage to spending money here as it will cost the same if not less in the uk.

Thistle- M

-

Number of posts: 5200
Location: the country
Your Mood Today:
Registration date: 2008-03-07
Save Tourism?
I was not aware that Tourism was in need of saving.
Having admired recent investment at OGH, Fermain Valley, Moores Group, Fleur du Jardin, Bella Luce, Douvres, Barberie, Fregate and others, I feel certain that there is plenty of future - as long as it is in the right hands.
States members and departments must recognise that a thriving hospitality industry is essential for the well being of all islanders and particularly finance and retail.
In the immediate future the airport runway must be resurfaced, key hotel sites like Penninsula, Vazon Bay, Idlerocks, preserved, and States owned attractions and property (Cliffs and gardens) properly financed.
Finally, in order to ensure a prosperous industry, a co-operative publicity and marketing group combining all sectors of industry and state must be given the role and budget to promote our island.
Having admired recent investment at OGH, Fermain Valley, Moores Group, Fleur du Jardin, Bella Luce, Douvres, Barberie, Fregate and others, I feel certain that there is plenty of future - as long as it is in the right hands.
States members and departments must recognise that a thriving hospitality industry is essential for the well being of all islanders and particularly finance and retail.
In the immediate future the airport runway must be resurfaced, key hotel sites like Penninsula, Vazon Bay, Idlerocks, preserved, and States owned attractions and property (Cliffs and gardens) properly financed.
Finally, in order to ensure a prosperous industry, a co-operative publicity and marketing group combining all sectors of industry and state must be given the role and budget to promote our island.
Roy Bisson- 1

-

Number of posts: 3
Location: St. Peter Port North
Registration date: 2008-03-24










